Autonomy, Trust, and Stewardship: Centering Participants in AI-Enabled Trial Matching.

The article focuses on the ethical considerations and practical implications of using artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for clinical research recruitment, specifically in trial matching and recruitment processes. It distinguishes between participant-to-trial matching, where individuals or clini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Journal of Bioethics Vol. 26; no. 8; pp. 49 - 53
Main Authors: Heidelberg, Melissa, Kultgen, Benjamin, Butler, Kelly K., Bott, Nicholas T.
Format: commentary Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Aug2026
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:The article focuses on the ethical considerations and practical implications of using artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool for clinical research recruitment, specifically in trial matching and recruitment processes. It distinguishes between participant-to-trial matching, where individuals or clinicians seek relevant trials using AI tools, and trial-to-participant matching, where researchers or sponsors identify eligible participants through AI-enabled data analysis. The discussion emphasizes situating AI trial matching within a broader ecosystem involving data stewardship, institutional coordination, participant autonomy, and public trust, highlighting the importance of transparency, meaningful consent, fairness, and oversight. The article also notes the growing role of AI in accelerating trial enrollment, reducing costs, and potentially improving inclusivity in clinical research, while underscoring the need for responsible deployment aligned with bioethical principles and regulatory compliance.