WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE "NEW" SCIENCE CURRICULA?

The article discusses the development of science curricula and science programs. The critics of school science have given their complaints about school science programs and said that these were repetitive and insufficiently developmental in character. The concern was also expressed in stating that l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational Leadership Vol. 30; no. 7; pp. 600 - 604
Main Author: Rutledge, James A.
Format: Article
Published: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development Apr1973
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=21506288&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 21506288
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00131784
        EDL
      jtl: Educational Leadership
      issn: 00131784
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr1973
      vid: 30
      iid: 7
      pid: 69
      pub: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development
    artinfo:
      ui: 21506288
      ppf: 600
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE "NEW" SCIENCE CURRICULA?
      aug:
        au: Rutledge, James A.
        affil: Associate Dean, Graduate College, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
      su:
        Science education
        Curriculum
        Philosophy of science
        Science projects
        Science
        Teaching
        Critics
        Education
      sug:
        subj:
          Science education
          Curriculum
          Philosophy of science
          Science projects
          Science
          Teaching
          Critics
          Education
      ab: The article discusses the development of science curricula and science programs. The critics of school science have given their complaints about school science programs and said that these were repetitive and insufficiently developmental in character. The concern was also expressed in stating that little emphasis was being given to the philosophy and processes of science. Laboratory works also seemed to be unimportant in most school science. Despite that, some of the accepted school science curricula were expected to be improve and revised to continue their progress and viability.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1973
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N