RETHINKING WAR POWERS: BY LAW OR BY "THAUMATURGIC INVOCATION"?
The article presents a perspective on the issues surrounding the War Powers Resolution of the U.S. foreign policy. It has been noted that the joint resolution is not steadfast in affection or allegiance to its stated purposes. In addition, the resolution has not been contributive to decisive confron...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of International Law Vol. 83; no. 4; pp. 766 - 778 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Oct89
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=27725795&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 27725795 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00029300 AIL jtl: American Journal of International Law issn: 00029300 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct89 vid: 83 iid: 4 pid: 96 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 27725795 10.2307/2203365 ppf: 766 ppct: 12 formats: tig: atl: RETHINKING WAR POWERS: BY LAW OR BY "THAUMATURGIC INVOCATION"? aug: au: Thomas M.Franck affil: Murry and Ida Becker Professor of Law, New York University su: War & emergency legislation War powers Legislative power Executive power Legislative bills Legislation International relations Patriotism United States sug: subj: United States War & emergency legislation War powers Legislative power Executive power Legislative bills Legislation International relations Patriotism ab: The article presents a perspective on the issues surrounding the War Powers Resolution of the U.S. foreign policy. It has been noted that the joint resolution is not steadfast in affection or allegiance to its stated purposes. In addition, the resolution has not been contributive to decisive confrontation or to cooperation between the sectors. Furthermore, it has been suggested by the author that the failure of the resolution has the need to explain to a congressional misperception of what legislation could achieve. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1989 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|