The Construct Validity of Task Inventory Ratings: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis.
This study investigated the construct validity of task inventory ratings from job incumbents and supervisors in 2 jobs on the 4 task dimensions of importance, criticality of error, difficulty to learn, and time spent. Job incumbents completed task ratings on either the typical relative scales or abs...
| Publicado en: | Human Performance Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 1 - 23 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=3334609&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 3334609 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 08959285 7LX jtl: Human Performance issn: 08959285 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2000 vid: 13 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 3334609 10.1207/S15327043HUP1301_1 ppf: 1 ppct: 22 formats: tig: atl: The Construct Validity of Task Inventory Ratings: A Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis. aug: au: Manson, Todd M. Levine, Edward L. Brannick, Michael T. affil: University of South Florida su: Occupational values inventory Employee reviews Task analysis sug: subj: Occupational values inventory Employee reviews Task analysis ab: This study investigated the construct validity of task inventory ratings from job incumbents and supervisors in 2 jobs on the 4 task dimensions of importance, criticality of error, difficulty to learn, and time spent. Job incumbents completed task ratings on either the typical relative scales or absolute scales developed for each dimension; supervisors completed relative ratings only. Relative ratings from incumbents and supervisors were each compared in multitrait-multimethod analyses with the absolute ratings. Ratings on all task dimensions demonstrated high convergent validity, and time spent and difficulty to learn ratings met criteria for discriminant validity in at least 1 job. Practical implications regarding redundancy among ratings on different task dimensions, the use of both incumbents and supervisors as job analysis respondents, and the use of absolute scales in task analysis are discussed. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|