The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.

There is growing interest in understanding and eliciting division of labor within groups of scientists. This paper illustrates the need for this division of labor through a historical example, and a formal model is presented to better analyze situations of this type. Analysis of this model reveals t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Erkenntnis Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 17 - 36
Autor principal: Zollman, Kevin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=45547790&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 45547790
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2010
      vid: 72
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        45547790
        10.1007/s10670-009-9194-6
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 397KB
      tig:
        atl: The Epistemic Benefit of Transient Diversity.
      aug:
        au: Zollman, Kevin
        affil: Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh USA
      su:
        Labor
        Diversity in the workplace
        Scientists
        Scientific method
        Homogeneity
      sug:
        subj:
          Labor
          Diversity in the workplace
          Scientists
          Scientific method
          Homogeneity
      ab: There is growing interest in understanding and eliciting division of labor within groups of scientists. This paper illustrates the need for this division of labor through a historical example, and a formal model is presented to better analyze situations of this type. Analysis of this model reveals that a division of labor can be maintained in two different ways: by limiting information or by endowing the scientists with extreme beliefs. If both features are present however, cognitive diversity is maintained indefinitely, and as a result agents fail to converge to the truth. Beyond the mechanisms for creating diversity suggested here, this shows that the real epistemic goal is not diversity but transient diversity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2010. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2010
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N