Time Limit for Prosecution.

The article discusses a court case wherein the appellant issued a guilty plea to charges of allegedly obtaining restricted access to a computer data, which is in violation of section 1 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990, following a ruling by justices on section 11(4) in Great Britain. The justices ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Criminal Law Review no. 12; pp. 897 - 900
Main Author: D. C. O.
Format: Article
Published: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=45691379&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 45691379
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0011135X
        L7J
      jtl: Criminal Law Review
      issn: 0011135X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2009
      iid: 12
      pid: 3063
      pub: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
    artinfo:
      ui: 45691379
      ppf: 897
      ppct: 3
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Time Limit for Prosecution.
      aug:
        au: D. C. O.
      su:
        Actions & defenses (Law)
        Computer access control
        Computer laws
        Criminal procedure
        Legal judgments
        Great Britain. Divisional Court
        United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          United Kingdom
          Actions & defenses (Law)
          Computer access control
          Computer laws
          Criminal procedure
          Legal judgments
          Great Britain. Divisional Court
      ab: The article discusses a court case wherein the appellant issued a guilty plea to charges of allegedly obtaining restricted access to a computer data, which is in violation of section 1 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990, following a ruling by justices on section 11(4) in Great Britain. The justices asserted the lack of basis for stating that the proceedings were out of time since they are prevented by the section from examining a certificate presented by a prosecutor. Also analyzed is the judgment of the Divisional Court in the case Morgans versus DPP.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2009
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N