Trade vs. Security.

Kenneth I. Juster, Under Secretary of the Bureau of Industry and Security at the U.S. Department of Commerce, challenges comments made in Gary Milhollin's “Trading with the Enemy,” which appeared in the May issue. Juster charges that Milhollin makes a number of incorrect assertions that undercut hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Commentary Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 3 - 8
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Commentary, Inc. September 2002
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=503924529&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 503924529
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00102601
        CMM
      jtl: Commentary
      issn: 00102601
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: September 2002
      vid: 114
      iid: 2
      pid: 128
      pub: Commentary, Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui: 503924529
      ppf: 3
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Trade vs. Security.
      aug:
      su:
        Technology transfer
        Weapons of mass destruction
        National security
        Export controls
        History
        High technology industries
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Technology transfer
          Weapons of mass destruction
          National security
          Export controls
          History
          High technology industries
      ab: Kenneth I. Juster, Under Secretary of the Bureau of Industry and Security at the U.S. Department of Commerce, challenges comments made in Gary Milhollin's “Trading with the Enemy,” which appeared in the May issue. Juster charges that Milhollin makes a number of incorrect assertions that undercut his argument: Milhollin states that the bill that the White House is currently pushing through Congress would decontrol many of the products that the Customs Service has placed on its list of “most dangerous goods”; he also asserts that if it was enacted, the law would oblige the secretary of commerce to permit the export of rocket technology. The bill does not order the controls on any item to be removed, Juster contends; instead, it instructs the Commerce Department to investigate a series of factors to ascertain if any article is eligible for decontrol. Milhollin replies.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N