An examination of five statistical software packages for epidemiology.

The writer reviews the DOS versions of five statistical software packages for epidemiology and clinical trials. The packages considered are EPI INFO, version 6.04 b; EPICURE, version 2.0; EPILOG PLUS, version 3.07; STATA, version 5.0; and TRUE EPISTAT, version 5.3 a. Although the packages differ i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Statistician Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 267 - 281
Main Author: Oster, Robert A.
Format: Product Evaluation
Published: American Statistical Association August 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507659704&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507659704
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00031305
        STT
      jtl: American Statistician
      issn: 00031305
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: August 1998
      vid: 52
      iid: 3
      pid: 543
      pub: American Statistical Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507659704
        10.2307/2685942
      ppf: 267
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: An examination of five statistical software packages for epidemiology.
      aug:
        au: Oster, Robert A.
      su:
        Statistical software
        Epidemiology -- Software
        Biometry software
      sug:
        subj:
          Statistical software
          Epidemiology -- Software
          Biometry software
      ab: The writer reviews the DOS versions of five statistical software packages for epidemiology and clinical trials. The packages considered are EPI INFO, version 6.04 b; EPICURE, version 2.0; EPILOG PLUS, version 3.07; STATA, version 5.0; and TRUE EPISTAT, version 5.3 a. Although the packages differ in their target audiences, interfaces, capabilities, and approaches, they are analyzed according to criteria that are of most interest to epidemiologists, biostatisticians, and others involved in epidemiologic and clinical research. The packages are compared with regard to installation and hardware requirements, interface, documentation, database management, statistical graphics, statistical analysis, and accuracy of statistical procedures.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Product Evaluation
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N