Reply to “From basic research to interventions”.

A response to a commentary by Stanley et al. that appears in this issue on the writers' “Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions,” which appears in the Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 60, 1998, pp. 5-22. The writers note that the principle themes of Stanley et...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Marriage & Family Vol. 62; no. 1; pp. 265 - 274
Autores principales: Gottman, John, Carrère, Sybil, Swanson, Catherine
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell February 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507687616&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507687616
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00222445
        JMA
      jtl: Journal of Marriage & Family
      issn: 00222445
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: February 2000
      vid: 62
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507687616
        10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00265.x
      ppf: 265
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 682KB
      tig:
        atl: Reply to “From basic research to interventions”.
      aug:
        au:
          Gottman, John
          Carrère, Sybil
          Swanson, Catherine
      su:
        Marital satisfaction
        Divorce & psychology
      sug:
        subj:
          Marital satisfaction
          Divorce & psychology
      ab: A response to a commentary by Stanley et al. that appears in this issue on the writers' “Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions,” which appears in the Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 60, 1998, pp. 5-22. The writers note that the principle themes of Stanley et al.'s critique were that the writers stated their findings too strongly, they did not fully address the hypotheses being tested, and the results were based on nonreplicated findings. They tackle each of the specific criticisms raised by Stanley et al. in the order that they appeared in their commentary, addressing six methodological issues and two conceptual issue raised.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N