Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness: testing the theoretical models of Bolman & Deal and Quinn.

This study examined the differences in gender between a “balanced” or “unbalanced” orientation of leadership, leadership characteristics, and the perceived effectiveness of educational leaders through subordinate responses in the context of Bolman and Deal's (1991, 1997) four-frame leadership theory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sex Roles Vol. 42; no. 11/12; pp. 969 - 993
Autor principal: Thompson, Michael D.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. June 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507699600&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507699600
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03600025
        SXR
      jtl: Sex Roles
      issn: 03600025
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: June 2000
      vid: 42
      iid: 11/12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui: 507699600
      ppf: 969
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 22.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Gender, leadership orientation, and effectiveness: testing the theoretical models of Bolman & Deal and Quinn.
      aug:
        au: Thompson, Michael D.
      su:
        Deal, Terrence E.
        Quinn, Robert E.
        Bolman, Lee G.
        Leadership
        Gender differences (Psychology)
        Success
        School administration
        Vocational guidance
      sug:
        subj:
          Leadership
          Gender differences (Psychology)
          Success
          School administration
          Vocational guidance
          Deal, Terrence E.
          Quinn, Robert E.
          Bolman, Lee G.
      ab: This study examined the differences in gender between a “balanced” or “unbalanced” orientation of leadership, leadership characteristics, and the perceived effectiveness of educational leaders through subordinate responses in the context of Bolman and Deal's (1991, 1997) four-frame leadership theory and Quinn's (1988) competing values model. The findings suggests that any difference in the perceived effectiveness of educational leaders in the three leadership type groups are equally true for male and female leaders, and that male and female educational leaders were perceived to be equally effective in their respective organizations despite the stereotypical connotations asserted in previous research. In addition, no significant differences were found between men and women in their leadership characteristics, which stands in contrast to extant research-supported evidence. This study analyzed the ratings of 57 leaders (males = 31; females = 26) by 472 subordinate participants (males =234; females = 238) from lower, middle, and upper management levels in secondary and postsecondary institutions. Approximately 60% of the participants and one third of the educational leaders were African Americans. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N