Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: The SERIOL model account.

A large orthographic neighborhood (N) facilitates lexical decision for central and left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH) presentation, but not for right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) presentation. Based on the SERIOL model of letter-position encoding, this asymmetric N effect is explai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cognitive Psychology Vol. 51; no. 3; pp. 179 - 214
Autores principales: Whitney, Carol, Lavidor, Michal
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. November 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507839712&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507839712
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00100285
        COP
      jtl: Cognitive Psychology
      issn: 00100285
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: November 2005
      vid: 51
      iid: 3
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507839712
        10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.001
      ppf: 179
      ppct: 35
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: The SERIOL model account.
      aug:
        au:
          Whitney, Carol
          Lavidor, Michal
      su:
        Brain function localization
        Word recognition
      sug:
        subj:
          Brain function localization
          Word recognition
      ab: A large orthographic neighborhood (N) facilitates lexical decision for central and left visual field/right hemisphere (LVF/RH) presentation, but not for right visual field/left hemisphere (RVF/LH) presentation. Based on the SERIOL model of letter-position encoding, this asymmetric N effect is explained by differential activation patterns at the orthographic level. This analysis implies that it should be possible to negate the LVF/RH N effect and create an RVF/LH N effect by manipulating contrast levels in specific ways. In Experiment 1, these predictions were confirmed. In Experiment 2, we eliminated the N effect for both LVF/RH and central presentation. These results indicate that the letter level is the primary locus of the N effect under lexical decision, and that the hemispheric specificity of the N effect does not reflect differential processing at the lexical level. Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N