Processing and Linguistic Markers in Young Children With Specific Language Impairment (SLI)
Thirty-two 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 32 chronological age (CA) controls completed 4 tasks that were considered potential positive markers for SLI. Children's performance on 2 linguistic tasks (past tense and noun plurals task) and 2 processing tasks (nonword rep...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 1029 - 1038 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
October 2003
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507855790&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 507855790 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10924388 1SM jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research issn: 10924388 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: October 2003 vid: 46 iid: 5 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association artinfo: ui: 507855790 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/082) ppf: 1029 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 3.4MB tig: atl: Processing and Linguistic Markers in Young Children With Specific Language Impairment (SLI) aug: au: Conti-Ramsden, Gina su: Language disorders Psycholinguistics Children with learning disabilities Psychology sug: subj: Language disorders Psycholinguistics Children with learning disabilities Psychology ab: Thirty-two 5-year-old children with specific language impairment (SLI) and 32 chronological age (CA) controls completed 4 tasks that were considered potential positive markers for SLI. Children's performance on 2 linguistic tasks (past tense and noun plurals task) and 2 processing tasks (nonword repetition and digit recall) were examined. This approach allowed the examination of more than 1 type of marker simultaneously, facilitating both comparisons between markers and also the evaluation of combinations of markers in relation to identifying SLI. Children with SLI performed significantly worse than CA controls in all 4 marker tasks. Specificity/sensitivity analysis of the 4 marker tasks revealed nonword repetition and the past tense task to have the best overall accuracy at the 25th and 16th percentile. Finally, stepwise discriminant analysis revealed nonword repetition and past tense marking to be the best markers for identifying young children with SLI. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|