Timing of cueing in complex problem-solving tasks: Learner versus system control.

Task-specific cueing formats that promote the automation and construction of problem-solving schemas should ideally be presented just in time to students learning to solve complex problems. This article reports experimental work comparing learner-controlled cueing, system-controlled cueing, and no c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 191 - 206
Main Authors: Hummel, Hans G. K., Paas, Fred, Koper, E. J. R.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier Science March 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=507875137&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 507875137
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07475632
        JC4
      jtl: Computers in Human Behavior
      issn: 07475632
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March 2006
      vid: 22
      iid: 2
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        507875137
        10.1016/j.chb.2004.08.001
      ppf: 191
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Timing of cueing in complex problem-solving tasks: Learner versus system control.
      aug:
        au:
          Hummel, Hans G. K.
          Paas, Fred
          Koper, E. J. R.
      su:
        Schemas (Psychology)
        Problem solving
        Prompts (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Schemas (Psychology)
          Problem solving
          Prompts (Psychology)
      ab: Task-specific cueing formats that promote the automation and construction of problem-solving schemas should ideally be presented just in time to students learning to solve complex problems. This article reports experimental work comparing learner-controlled cueing, system-controlled cueing, and no cueing among 34 sophomore law students in a multimedia practical aimed at learning to prepare and hold a plea in court. The cueing consisted of a combination of process worksheets (PW) and worked out examples (WOE). Our main hypotheses that participants with cueing would outperform those without cueing and that participants with learner-controlled cueing would outperform those with system-controlled cueing were partly confirmed by the learning and transfer outcomes on a training and transfer task. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed. Copyright (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N