The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load.

Two hundred and thirty three 15-year old students conducted experiments within a computer-based learning environment. They were provided with different goals according to an experimental 2x2 design with goal specificity (nonspecific goals versus specific goals) and goal type (problem solving goals v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Computers in Human Behavior Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 299 - 306
Autores principales: Wirth, Joachim, Künsting, Josef, Leutner, Detlev
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Elsevier Science March 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508048340&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508048340
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07475632
        JC4
      jtl: Computers in Human Behavior
      issn: 07475632
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: March 2009
      vid: 25
      iid: 2
      pid: 2410
      pub: Elsevier Science
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508048340
        10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.004
      ppf: 299
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The impact of goal specificity and goal type on learning outcome and cognitive load.
      aug:
        au:
          Wirth, Joachim
          Künsting, Josef
          Leutner, Detlev
      su:
        Goal (Psychology)
        Learning by discovery
        Problem solving
        Short-term memory
        Cognitive psychology research
      sug:
        subj:
          Goal (Psychology)
          Learning by discovery
          Problem solving
          Short-term memory
          Cognitive psychology research
      keyword: Cognitive load
      ab: Two hundred and thirty three 15-year old students conducted experiments within a computer-based learning environment. They were provided with different goals according to an experimental 2x2 design with goal specificity (nonspecific goals versus specific goals) and goal type (problem solving goals versus learning goals) as factors. We replicated the findings of other researchers that nonspecific problem solving goals lead to lower cognitive load and better learning than specific problem solving goals. For learning goals, however, we observed this goal specificity effect only on cognitive load but not on learning outcome. Results indicate that the goal specificity affects the element interactivity of a task and cognitive load with both, problem solving goals or learning goals. But differences in overall cognitive load are not sufficient for explaining differences in learning outcome. Additionally, differences in strategy use come into play. Specific problem solving goals seem to restrict students to use a problem solving strategy whereas nonspecific problem solving goals or learning goals allow students to use a learning strategy. We conclude that in order to foster learning, students must be provided with goals that allow them to use a learning strategy. Additionally, providing them with nonspecific goals decreases cognitive load and, thus, enables students to learn with less effort. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N