Four electronic tables for probability distributions.

A review of four packages for MS-DOS personal computers: Electronic Tables, PCalc, StaTable, and STAT-POWER. Each package produces cumulative probabilities and quantiles for the most common statistical distributions. Information is provided for each package relating to installation, contents, int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Statistician Vol. 48; pp. 153 - 163
Autores principales: Boomsma, Anne, Molenaar, Ivo W.
Formato: Product Evaluation
Publicado: American Statistical Association May 1994
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508518717&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508518717
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00031305
        STT
      jtl: American Statistician
      issn: 00031305
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 1994
      vid: 48
      pid: 543
      pub: American Statistical Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508518717
        10.2307/2684276
      ppf: 153
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Four electronic tables for probability distributions.
      aug:
        au:
          Boomsma, Anne
          Molenaar, Ivo W.
      su:
        Distribution (Probability theory)
        Statistical software
        Computer software
      sug:
        subj:
          Distribution (Probability theory)
          Statistical software
          Computer software
      ab: A review of four packages for MS-DOS personal computers: Electronic Tables, PCalc, StaTable, and STAT-POWER. Each package produces cumulative probabilities and quantiles for the most common statistical distributions. Information is provided for each package relating to installation, contents, interface, algorithms, precision, and documentation. It is concluded that all four packages possess their strong and weak points, and that users should therefore make a choice that is adapted to their own needs and resources.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Product Evaluation
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N