Assessing change with preventive interventions: the Reliable Change Index.

Part of a special section on the psychometric assessment of couples, marriages, and families. A study was conducted to assess the utility of the Reliable Change Index (RC) for evaluating the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Data were drawn from 99 newlywed couples who were assigned to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Family Relations Vol. 44; pp. 278 - 285
Autor principal: Hawley, Dale R.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell July 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508562656&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 508562656
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01976664
        FMR
      jtl: Family Relations
      issn: 01976664
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 1995
      vid: 44
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        508562656
        10.2307/585526
      ppf: 278
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 845KB
      tig:
        atl: Assessing change with preventive interventions: the Reliable Change Index.
      aug:
        au: Hawley, Dale R.
      su:
        Couples counseling
        Family psychotherapy
      sug:
        subj:
          Couples counseling
          Family psychotherapy
      ab: Part of a special section on the psychometric assessment of couples, marriages, and families. A study was conducted to assess the utility of the Reliable Change Index (RC) for evaluating the effectiveness of preventive interventions. Data were drawn from 99 newlywed couples who were assigned to a Learning to Live Together, a Growing Together, a Training in Marriage Enrichment, or a control treatment group. Results revealed that in addition to supporting the same outcome findings as an analysis of covariance, the RC scores suggested that the outcome of the various treatment programs may differ in other ways when the proportion of cases reporting reliable change was considered. Moreover, the RC procedure featured a bidirectional analysis that allowed for the examination of both positive and negative changes. It is concluded that the RC appears to have utility for evaluating outcomes in preventive intervention with nonclinical groups.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N