Those who can, teach.
Some U.S. companies have begun educating their staff at in-house universities. U.S. firms appear to have learned that no company can guarantee a worker a job for life, that the most important asset for the company and the worker is knowledge, and that as technology and working methods frequently ch...
| Publicado en: | Economist Vol. 337; p. 79 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Economist Newspaper Limited
October 28 1995
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=508574115&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 508574115 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00130613 ECO jtl: Economist issn: 00130613 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: October 28 1995 vid: 337 pid: 161 pub: Economist Newspaper Limited artinfo: ui: 508574115 ppf: 79 formats: tig: atl: Those who can, teach. aug: su: Employee training sug: subj: Employee training ab: Some U.S. companies have begun educating their staff at in-house universities. U.S. firms appear to have learned that no company can guarantee a worker a job for life, that the most important asset for the company and the worker is knowledge, and that as technology and working methods frequently change, a worker continually needs to acquire new sills. Some companies are establishing formal connections with local colleges, and others offer classes via satellite or on computer programs. A few companies even grant their own degrees. The largest growth area is in formal management training schools. It is generally believed that, although corporate-education programs do not come cheap, an ill-trained workforce can prove more expensive. The biggest gain, however, may be employee morale. pubtype: Periodical doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|