Assessing the social determinants of negotiator preferences: the case of a collective bargaining simulation.

A study was conducted to examine how the preferences of a negotiator are formed in bargaining situations in which an individual represents a group of individuals. Subjects were 53 students attending a labor-management course at Western Michigan University. A policy-capturing approach within the co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Psychology Vol. 129; pp. 249 - 260
Main Authors: Viswesvaran, Chockalingam, Deshpande, Satish P.
Format: Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd May 1995
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510132560&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 510132560
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00223980
        JPY
      jtl: Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00223980
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May 1995
      vid: 129
      pid: 58221
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        510132560
        10.1080/00223980.1995.9914962
      ppf: 249
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Assessing the social determinants of negotiator preferences: the case of a collective bargaining simulation.
      aug:
        au:
          Viswesvaran, Chockalingam
          Deshpande, Satish P.
      su: Negotiation
      sug:
        subj: Negotiation
      ab: A study was conducted to examine how the preferences of a negotiator are formed in bargaining situations in which an individual represents a group of individuals. Subjects were 53 students attending a labor-management course at Western Michigan University. A policy-capturing approach within the context of a collective-bargaining simulation was employed, and the simulation was constructed based on the literature on industrial relations, principal-agent relations, managerial intervention, and frustration-regression mechanisms. Moreover, the use of these procedures enabled the voice mechanism that is hypothesized for unions to be tested. The findings revealed that the importance of a bargaining issue to a union negotiator was determined by member preferences, management's capacity to concede the demands, support of the national union, and management's resistance to the issue. In addition, support was found for the voice mechanism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N