Co-operative Values, Institutions and Free Riding in Australia: Can It Learn from Canada?
While there is a strong logic favouring co-operation, it faces a central problem: the “free rider” or “cheat.” Collectives find ways of promoting norms of solidarity and seek regulation to prevent free riding. Around two-fifths of Australian employees covered by collective agreements are free-riding...
| Publicado en: | Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. 709 - 737 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations
2005
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510450674&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510450674 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0034379X RID jtl: Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations issn: 0034379X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2005 vid: 60 iid: 4 pid: 2433 pub: Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations artinfo: ui: 510450674 ppf: 709 ppct: 28 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 164KB tig: atl: Co-operative Values, Institutions and Free Riding in Australia: Can It Learn from Canada? aug: au: Peetz, David su: Labor laws Organizational change Collectivism (Social psychology) Labor union members Australia sug: subj: Australia Labor laws Organizational change Collectivism (Social psychology) Labor union members ab: While there is a strong logic favouring co-operation, it faces a central problem: the “free rider” or “cheat.” Collectives find ways of promoting norms of solidarity and seek regulation to prevent free riding. Around two-fifths of Australian employees covered by collective agreements are free-riding non-members. Evidence suggests that the recent growth of free riding reflects institutional changes and not the decline of co-operative values and the ascendancy of individualism. The Canadian solution to the cheating problem, which is the Rand formula, inspired Australian unions to introduce (excessive) “agency fees” into collective agreements. These were eventually stopped by the state. Alternative models include “social obligation fees” — provisions for employees covered by the agreement to make a contribution to a voluntary organization of their choice. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|