Familiarization Effects for Bilingual Letter Detection Involving Translation or Exact Text Repetition.

In two experiments, English-Spanish bilinguals read passages, performing letter detection on some passages by circling target letters as they read. Detection passages were sometimes familiarized (primed) by prior reading of the same passage or a translation of it. Participants detected letters in En...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 304 - 316
Autores principales: Thomas, Holly Krech, Healy, Alice F., Greenberg, Seth N.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Canadian Psychological Association December 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In two experiments, English-Spanish bilinguals read passages, performing letter detection on some passages by circling target letters as they read. Detection passages were sometimes familiarized (primed) by prior reading of the same passage or a translation of it. Participants detected letters in English passages in Experiment 1 and in Spanish passages in Experiment 2. For both experiments, a missing letter effect occurred (depressed detection accuracy on frequent function words relative to less frequent content words). Familiarization promoted overall improvements in letter detection only for English passages, suggesting that reprocessing benefits depend on high language fluency. For Spanish passages, cognates engendered greater error rates than noncognates; the visual similarity of Spanish and English cognates apparently enabled faster identification of Spanish cognates in a way unaffected by familiarization of the whole text passage. Priming by familiarized text was significantly higher when the passages were in the same language than when they were in different languages, suggesting that the reprocessing benefits are at the word level instead of the semantic level. These results are consistent with the GO model of reading (Greenberg, Healy, Koriat, & Kreiner, 2004) but require an expanded consideration of attention redistribution processes in that model. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.