Applying research on family education about mental illness to development of relatives' group consultation model.
Results from a random field trial of family education interventions were applied to create a new model of family education programs. This paper reviews the family education literature, the random field trial results, and the pre-piloting of an adapted service model called group consultation. The n...
| Publicado en: | Community Mental Health Journal Vol. 33; no. 6; pp. 555 - 570 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Science & Business Media B.V.
December 1997
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510868859&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510868859 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00103853 CMH jtl: Community Mental Health Journal issn: 00103853 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: December 1997 vid: 33 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Science & Business Media B.V. artinfo: ui: 510868859 ppf: 555 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1MB tig: atl: Applying research on family education about mental illness to development of relatives' group consultation model. aug: au: Mannion, Edie Draine, Jeffrey Solomon, Phyllis su: Family psychotherapy Family relationships of people with mental illness sug: subj: Family psychotherapy Family relationships of people with mental illness ab: Results from a random field trial of family education interventions were applied to create a new model of family education programs. This paper reviews the family education literature, the random field trial results, and the pre-piloting of an adapted service model called group consultation. The new model emphasizes a more interactive approach to the conventional group workshop model as opposed to adherence to a pre-planned curriculum. Pre-pilot group participants were all past members of group workshops. In a process evaluation these group members were questioned about their reactions to the new group format and its usefulness. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|