Animals, Agency, and Obligation in Kantian Ethics.
The writer examines efforts to defend, supplement, and amend Immanuel Kant's account of obligations to animals. She argues that nonrevisionist efforts to derive a robust account of obligations to animals create only the appearance of moral concern for animals. She further argues that revisionist s...
| Published in: | Social Theory & Practice Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 531 - 555 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Florida State University, Dept. of Philosophy
October 2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=510902159&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 510902159 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0037802X STP jtl: Social Theory & Practice issn: 0037802X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: October 2009 vid: 35 iid: 4 pid: 150 pub: Florida State University, Dept. of Philosophy artinfo: ui: 510902159 ppf: 531 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 5.5MB tig: atl: Animals, Agency, and Obligation in Kantian Ethics. aug: au: O'Hagan, Emer su: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 Animal welfare sug: subj: Animal welfare Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804 ab: The writer examines efforts to defend, supplement, and amend Immanuel Kant's account of obligations to animals. She argues that nonrevisionist efforts to derive a robust account of obligations to animals create only the appearance of moral concern for animals. She further argues that revisionist strategies fail to decisively overcome difficulties involved in extending the Kantian scope of moral concern to include animals. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|