The Supreme Court and the protection of minority rights: an empirical examination of racial discrimination cases.

The writer presents an empirical examination of racial discrimination case in the U.S. Supreme Court since 1954. She utilizes two improved methods of replicating this issue, known as the bulwark thesis and the majoritarian approach. She finds some support for the basic bulwark prediction over majo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Law & Society Review Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 291 - 314
Autor principal: Romero, Francine Sanders
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 2000
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=511147665&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 511147665
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00239216
        LSR
      jtl: Law & Society Review
      issn: 00239216
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2000
      vid: 34
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        511147665
        10.2307/3115085
      ppf: 291
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 202KB
      tig:
        atl: The Supreme Court and the protection of minority rights: an empirical examination of racial discrimination cases.
      aug:
        au: Romero, Francine Sanders
      su:
        Judicial process
        Civil rights
        Race discrimination lawsuits
        Statutory interpretation
        Constitutional law
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Judicial process
          Civil rights
          Race discrimination lawsuits
          Statutory interpretation
          Constitutional law
      keyword: United States -- Supreme Court -- Decisions -- History
      ab: The writer presents an empirical examination of racial discrimination case in the U.S. Supreme Court since 1954. She utilizes two improved methods of replicating this issue, known as the bulwark thesis and the majoritarian approach. She finds some support for the basic bulwark prediction over majoritarianism, although the bulwark thesis fails to receive full support because the ideologies of the Justices also exert a significant influence on outcomes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N