A maximal domain for the existence of strategy-proof rules.

The writers demonstrate that the maximal domain, including single-peaked preferences for strategy-proofness, efficiency, and symmetry, is unique and slightly larger than the single-peaked domain. They argue that this finding shows that the assumption of single-peakedness essentially cannot be weaken...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Economic Theory Vol. 78; no. 1; pp. 157 - 167
Autores principales: Ching, Stephen, Serizawa, Shigehiro
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. January 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512595966&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512595966
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00220531
        RTH
      jtl: Journal of Economic Theory
      issn: 00220531
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: January 1998
      vid: 78
      iid: 1
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        512595966
        10.1006/jeth.1997.2337
      ppf: 157
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A maximal domain for the existence of strategy-proof rules.
      aug:
        au:
          Ching, Stephen
          Serizawa, Shigehiro
      su:
        Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
        Consumer preferences
        Mathematical models
      sug:
        subj:
          Resource allocation -- Mathematical models
          Consumer preferences
          Mathematical models
      ab: The writers demonstrate that the maximal domain, including single-peaked preferences for strategy-proofness, efficiency, and symmetry, is unique and slightly larger than the single-peaked domain. They argue that this finding shows that the assumption of single-peakedness essentially cannot be weakened if one insists on strategy-proofness, together with the distributional requirement of symmetry and the optimality requirement of efficiency. They contend that this result can be alternatively understood as a general impossibility theorem.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N