Microsoft again in hot seat after new allegations of anti-competitive practices.

On July 23, 1998, Microsoft Corp. found itself once again facing congressional scrutiny amid new allegations that it has engaged in practices designed to drive out its competitors. At the second hearing this year on Microsoft's business practices, the Senate Judiciary Committee continued its invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:CQ Weekly Vol. 56; no. 30; pp. 2019 - 2020
Autor principal: Gruenwald, Juliana
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Congressional Quarterly Inc. July 25 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512684408&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512684408
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15215997
        3FZ
      jtl: CQ Weekly
      issn: 15215997
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: July 25 1998
      vid: 56
      iid: 30
      pid: 136
      pub: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui: 512684408
      ppf: 2019
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Microsoft again in hot seat after new allegations of anti-competitive practices.
      aug:
        au: Gruenwald, Juliana
      su:
        Microsoft Corp.
        Antitrust law
        Computer software industry
        Actions & defenses (Law)
        United States
      sug:
        subj:
          United States
          Microsoft Corp.
          Antitrust law
          Computer software industry
          Actions & defenses (Law)
      ab: On July 23, 1998, Microsoft Corp. found itself once again facing congressional scrutiny amid new allegations that it has engaged in practices designed to drive out its competitors. At the second hearing this year on Microsoft's business practices, the Senate Judiciary Committee continued its investigation into allegations that the software maker has used monopoly power over computer operating systems to leverage control in other markets. Microsoft declined the request of committee chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, to testify at the July 23 hearing, with Mark Murray, Microsoft's spokesman, stating that the firm has “gone the extra mile” to provide the committee with the information it has requested. Hatch is of the opinion that the Justice Department should broaden its probe of Microsoft, based on new allegations that were revealed at the hearing. Details of these allegations and of Microsoft's reaction to them are provided.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N