Class and elites: a rejoinder.

A response to J. Tittenbrun's commentary in this issue on the writer's “Elite Perceptions of Workers, Conflict and Socialism: The Case of Poland, 1956-1989,” which appeared in Science & Society, vol. 59, no. 4, 1995-96, pp. 470-497. The writer raises five points in relation to Tittenbrun's article...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Society Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 536 - 542
Autor principal: Gutiérrez, Sanín
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Guilford Publications Inc. Winter 1997-1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=512942527&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 512942527
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00368237
        SSO
      jtl: Science & Society
      issn: 00368237
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Winter 1997-1998
      vid: 61
      iid: 4
      pid: 186
      pub: Guilford Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui: 512942527
      ppf: 536
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Class and elites: a rejoinder.
      aug:
        au: Gutiérrez, Sanín
      su:
        Social groups
        Social conflict
        Elite (Social sciences)
        Poland
      sug:
        subj:
          Poland
          Social groups
          Social conflict
          Elite (Social sciences)
      ab: A response to J. Tittenbrun's commentary in this issue on the writer's “Elite Perceptions of Workers, Conflict and Socialism: The Case of Poland, 1956-1989,” which appeared in Science & Society, vol. 59, no. 4, 1995-96, pp. 470-497. The writer raises five points in relation to Tittenbrun's article. These include Tittenbrun's failure to grasp the point of the writer's article; how Tittenbrun plainly contradicts his own idea of real socialism; his incorrect assertion that the writer's explanation of the demise of real socialism is self-contradictory; how Tittenbrun's efforts to think in class categories implies class characterization, not class caricature; and the methodological differences between Tittenbrun and the writer and the motives around which these can be organized.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N