Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning.
Evidence for unconscious learning has typically been based on dissociations between direct and indirect tests of learning. Because of some inherent problems with dissociation logic, we applied the logic of opposition to 2 artificial grammar learning experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were ex...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Experimental Psychology. General Vol. 129; no. 4; pp. 457 - 471 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Psychological Association
December 2000
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=513044868&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 513044868 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00963445 EPG jtl: Journal of Experimental Psychology. General issn: 00963445 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: December 2000 vid: 129 iid: 4 pid: 34 pub: American Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 513044868 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.457 ppf: 457 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Beyond dissociation logic: evidence for controlled and automatic influences in artificial grammar learning. aug: au: Higham, Philip A. Vokey, John R. Pritchard, J. Lynne su: Incidental learning Consciousness sug: subj: Incidental learning Consciousness ab: Evidence for unconscious learning has typically been based on dissociations between direct and indirect tests of learning. Because of some inherent problems with dissociation logic, we applied the logic of opposition to 2 artificial grammar learning experiments. In Experiment 1, participants were exposed to 2 different sets of letter strings, generated from 2 different grammars, and later rated test strings for grammaticality with either in-concert (rate grammatical strings consistent with either structure) or opposition (rate grammatical only strings from 1 of the structures) instructions. Manipulating response deadline affected controlled, but not automatic influences. In Experiment 2, after similar training, a source-monitoring test was administered from which the in-concert and opposition conditions were derived. The test indicated that varying the retention interval affected controlled, but not automatic, influences. The results are discussed in terms of awareness, knowledge representation, and metacognitive processing. Reprinted by permission of the publisher. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|