‘Womanly Qualities’ and Contested Methodology: Gender and the Discipline of Economics in Late Imperial Germany.
This article analyses the affinities between two debates of the 1890s in Germany: one over women's intellectual abilities and one over the production of knowledge in economics. Economists and advocates for women's higher education found common cause and language because of the rhetorical centrality...
| Publicado en: | Gender & History Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 341 - 361 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Aug2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=52170291&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 52170291 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09535233 BPJ jtl: Gender & History issn: 09535233 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2010 vid: 22 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 52170291 10.1111/j.1468-0424.2010.01594.x ppf: 341 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 164KB tig: atl: ‘Womanly Qualities’ and Contested Methodology: Gender and the Discipline of Economics in Late Imperial Germany. aug: au: Zee, Marynel Ryan Van affil: University of Minnesota, Morris su: Women's history Social conditions of women Femininity History of economics History of scholarly method German history, 1871-1918 Social history Nineteenth century Germany United States sug: subj: Germany United States Women's history Social conditions of women Femininity History of economics History of scholarly method German history, 1871-1918 Social history Nineteenth century ab: This article analyses the affinities between two debates of the 1890s in Germany: one over women's intellectual abilities and one over the production of knowledge in economics. Economists and advocates for women's higher education found common cause and language because of the rhetorical centrality of the working woman, family and motherhood to a social reform discourse that connected the university, the women's movement and the state. The historical economists conceptualised their ‘science’ in a way that allowed ‘womanly qualities’ to be identified as appropriate to its optimal practice. A limited comparison with the United States highlights the historical specificity of this construction of social-scientific knowledge. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Gender & History is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Gender & History holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|