Resemblance: From a complementarity point of view?

Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondness and Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinki...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sign Systems Studies Vol. 38; no. 1-4; pp. 91 - 130
Main Author: Merrell, Floyd
Format: Essay
Published: University of Tartu 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondness and Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinking characteristic of semiosis - that is, the process by which everything is always becoming something other than what it was becoming - and at the same time it includes linear, bivalent classical logic as a subset. Certain aspects of the Dao, Buddhist philosophy, and Donald Davidson's 'radical interpretation' afford additional, and perhaps unexpected, support for the initial set of three premises.