Resemblance: From a complementarity point of view?
Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondness and Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinki...
| Publicado en: | Sign Systems Studies Vol. 38; no. 1-4; pp. 91 - 130 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Essay |
| Publicado: |
University of Tartu
2010
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=63194462&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 63194462 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 14064243 DSW jtl: Sign Systems Studies issn: 14064243 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2010 vid: 38 iid: 1-4 pid: 25096 pub: University of Tartu artinfo: ui: 63194462 10.12697/SSS.2010.38.1-4.04 ppf: 91 ppct: 39 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Resemblance: From a complementarity point of view? aug: au: Merrell, Floyd affil: Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA su: Resemblance (Philosophy) Semiotics Logic Buddhist philosophy Analogy Davidson, Donald, 1917-2003 sug: subj: Resemblance (Philosophy) Semiotics Logic Buddhist philosophy Analogy Davidson, Donald, 1917-2003 ab: Three premises set the stage for a Peirce based notion of resemblance, which, as Firstness, cannot be more than vaguely distinguished from Secondness and Thirdness. Inclusion of Firstness with, and within, Secondness and Thirdness, calls for a nonbivalent, nonlinear, context dependent mode of thinking characteristic of semiosis - that is, the process by which everything is always becoming something other than what it was becoming - and at the same time it includes linear, bivalent classical logic as a subset. Certain aspects of the Dao, Buddhist philosophy, and Donald Davidson's 'radical interpretation' afford additional, and perhaps unexpected, support for the initial set of three premises. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Essay src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Sign Systems Studies is the property of University of Tartu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Sign Systems Studies holder: University of Tartu dt: @attributes: year: 2010 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|