THE BARE NECESSITIES*.
The article offers the author's insights on substantivalism in General Theory of Relativity (GTR). The author notes that substantivalism is considered unproblematic in GTR because of the objection to the Hole Argument which makes assumptions on modality and determinism. He states that substantivalis...
| Publicado en: | Philosophical Perspectives Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 115 - 161 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2011
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=69972680&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 69972680 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15208583 51X jtl: Philosophical Perspectives issn: 15208583 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2011 vid: 25 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 69972680 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2011.00210.x ppf: 115 ppct: 46 formats: tig: atl: THE BARE NECESSITIES*. aug: au: Dasgupta, Shamik su: General relativity (Physics) Hypothesis Modality (Theory of knowledge) Determinism (Philosophy) Space Spacetime sug: subj: General relativity (Physics) Hypothesis Modality (Theory of knowledge) Determinism (Philosophy) Space Spacetime ab: The article offers the author's insights on substantivalism in General Theory of Relativity (GTR). The author notes that substantivalism is considered unproblematic in GTR because of the objection to the Hole Argument which makes assumptions on modality and determinism. He states that substantivalists denied the assumptions by endorsing anti-haecceitism. He cites other arguments with which substantivalism is vulnerable such as Newtonian view of space and Galilean view of spacetime. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2011 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|