Task Effects and Individual Differences in On-Line Processing of the Topic Structure of a Text.

Do experienced readers alter their processing of topics in a text according to task demands? Subjects read a text in preparation for a task that either emphasized topic information (outlining) or did not emphasize topic information (verification). Reading times were recorded for sentences which intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Discourse Processes Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 63 - 81
Autores principales: Lorch Jr., Robert F., Lorch, Elizabeth Pugzles, Mogan, Ann M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan-Mar87
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=7458829&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 7458829
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0163853X
        7LQ
      jtl: Discourse Processes
      issn: 0163853X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan-Mar87
      vid: 10
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        7458829
        10.1080/01638538709544659
      ppf: 63
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Task Effects and Individual Differences in On-Line Processing of the Topic Structure of a Text.
      aug:
        au:
          Lorch Jr., Robert F.
          Lorch, Elizabeth Pugzles
          Mogan, Ann M.
      su:
        Individual differences
        Online data processing
      sug:
        subj:
          Individual differences
          Online data processing
      ab: Do experienced readers alter their processing of topics in a text according to task demands? Subjects read a text in preparation for a task that either emphasized topic information (outlining) or did not emphasize topic information (verification). Reading times were recorded for sentences which introduced either major or minor shifts of text topics. Subjects read topic sentences more slowly if they introduced major topic shifts, but the magnitude of the effect depended upon the task and the subjects' text recall ability. The effect was greater for better recallers than for poorer recallers. Also, the effect was greater in the outline task than in the verification task, but only for better recallers. The results indicate that: (a) Readers determine topic interrelations as they encounter new topics during reading; (b) better recallers are more consistent about inferring topic interrelations; and (c) better recallers are more flexible in their processing of topic information.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1987
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N