Rescuing dispositionalism from the ultimate problem: reply to Barker and Smart.
Barker and Smart have argued that dispositional monism is just as susceptible to the ultimate regress problem as Armstrong’s contingent necessitation view of laws. In this response, I consider what implications this conclusion has for the dispositional essentialist project more generally. I argue th...
| Publicado en: | Analysis Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 723 - 732 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Oct2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |