THE OPEN QUESTION ARGUMENT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF REDUCTIONISM.
In this paper I am interested in which reductionist positions are blocked, and on what grounds, by the Open Question Argument (OQA) both historically and by its contemporary guises. I single out four most salient interpretations of the OQA and analyze their impact on the possibility of reductionist...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 81; no. Supp; pp. 37 - 51 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2012 Supplement
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=85803347&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 85803347 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2012 Supplement vid: 81 iid: Supp pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 85803347 ppf: 37 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 546KB tig: atl: THE OPEN QUESTION ARGUMENT AND THE POSSIBILITY OF REDUCTIONISM. aug: au: Vasilionytė, Ieva affil: Vilnius University, Department of Logic and History of Philosophy, Universiteto g. 9/1, LT-01513 Vilnius su: Reductionism Open-ended questions Argument Naturalism Semantics (Philosophy) Schizophrenia sug: subj: Reductionism Open-ended questions Argument Naturalism Semantics (Philosophy) Schizophrenia keyword: atvirojo klausimo argumentas ethical naturalism etinis natūralizmas normativity normatyvumas Open Question Argument reductionism reduktyvizmas atvirojo klausimo argumentas etinis natūralizmas normatyvumas reduktyvizmas ab: In this paper I am interested in which reductionist positions are blocked, and on what grounds, by the Open Question Argument (OQA) both historically and by its contemporary guises. I single out four most salient interpretations of the OQA and analyze their impact on the possibility of reductionist theories of evaluative properties. It will be suggested that the OQA poses a serious threat to semantic naturalism about moral terms, but does not block the possibility of metaphysical ethical naturalism (though possibly condemns it to a certain schizophrenia). Šiame straipsnyje nagrinėjama, kokių reduktyvizmo formų galimybę blokuoja vadinamasis atvirojo klausimo argumentas (AKA) -- tiek savo istoriniu, tiek šiandieniais pavidalais -- ir kokiu pagrindu. Išskirtos keturios svarbiausios AKA interpretacijos ir išanalizuotas jų poveikis vertinamųjų savybių reduktyvistinių, teorijų galimybei. Teigiu, jog AKA kelia didelę grėsmę semantiniam etiniam natūralizmui, tačiau ne metafiziniam etiniam natūralizmui (nors ir pasmerkia jį tam tikrai „šizofrenijai"). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2012 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|