Imagen de Portada
Código QR

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION -- COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT -- NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT EMPLOYEES' UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ACCESSIBLE INFORMATION DID NOT VIOLATE THE CFAA. -- United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012) (en bane).

The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the 2012 case United States v. Nosal which deals with a statutory interpretation of the nation's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as the legal aspects of computer hacking and the transmission of confidential infor...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Harvard Law Review Vol. 126; no. 5; pp. 1454 - 1462
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Harvard Law Review Association Mar2013
Materias:
Interpretation & construction of American law
Nosal, David
Computer hacking > Law & legislation
United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
Computer fraud laws
Disclosure laws
Confidential communications
Korn/Ferry International (Company)
Actions & defenses (Law)
Employees
United States
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Sumario:The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the 2012 case United States v. Nosal which deals with a statutory interpretation of the nation's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as the legal aspects of computer hacking and the transmission of confidential information. Other topics include aiding and abetting, motions to dismiss, and U.S. government charges against former Korn/Ferry International (KFI) executive search firm employee David Nosal.