STATUTORY INTERPRETATION -- COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT -- NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT EMPLOYEES' UNAUTHORIZED USE OF ACCESSIBLE INFORMATION DID NOT VIOLATE THE CFAA. -- United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012) (en bane).

The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's ruling in the 2012 case United States v. Nosal which deals with a statutory interpretation of the nation's Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as well as the legal aspects of computer hacking and the transmission of confidential infor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos

Publicado en:	Harvard Law Review Vol. 126; no. 5; pp. 1454 - 1462
Formato:	Artículo
Publicado:	Harvard Law Review Association Mar2013
Materias:	Interpretation & construction of American law Nosal, David Computer hacking > Law & legislation United States. Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) Computer fraud laws Disclosure laws Confidential communications Korn/Ferry International (Company) Actions & defenses (Law) Employees United States
Acceso en línea:	Ver este registro en EBSCOhost