Energy Constraints.

Building on research in anthropology and philosophy, one can make a distinction between type I and type II energy ethics as a framework for advancing public debate about energy. Type I holds energy production and use as a fundamental good and is grounded in the assumption that increases in energy pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 19; no. 2; pp. 313 - 320
Main Authors: Mitcham, Carl, Rolston, Jessica
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Jun2013
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Building on research in anthropology and philosophy, one can make a distinction between type I and type II energy ethics as a framework for advancing public debate about energy. Type I holds energy production and use as a fundamental good and is grounded in the assumption that increases in energy production and consumption result in increases in human wellbeing. Conversely, type II questions the linear relationship between energy production and progress by examining questions of equity and human happiness. The type I versus type II framework helps to advance public debates about energy that address broad questions of profitability, regulation, and the environment, and in the process poses fundamental questions about the reverence for energy growth in advanced technological societies.