The Efficacy of a Vocabulary Intervention for Dual- Language Learners With Language Impairment.

Purpose: In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of a Spanish-English versus English-only vocabulary intervention for dual-language learners (DLLs) with language impairment compared to mathematics intervention groups and typically developing controls with no intervention. Further, in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 56; no. 2; pp. 748 - 766
Autores principales: Restrepo, Maria Adelaida, Morgan, Gareth P., Thompson, Marilyn S., Oetting, Janna
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Apr2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=90496206&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 90496206
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2013
      vid: 56
      iid: 2
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        90496206
        10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0173)
      ppf: 748
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 16.6MB
      tig:
        atl: The Efficacy of a Vocabulary Intervention for Dual- Language Learners With Language Impairment.
      aug:
        au:
          Restrepo, Maria Adelaida
          Morgan, Gareth P.
          Thompson, Marilyn S.
          Oetting, Janna
        affil:
          Arizona State University, Phoenix
          Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, University of Texas, Austin
      su:
        Multilingualism
        Vocabulary
        Children
        Treatment of language disorders
        Chi-squared test
        Experimental design
        Research funding
        Speech therapy
        Pre-tests & post-tests
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Multilingualism
          Vocabulary
          Children
          Treatment of language disorders
          Chi-squared test
          Experimental design
          Research funding
          Speech therapy
          Pre-tests & post-tests
          Descriptive statistics
      keyword:
        bilingual
        children
        cultural and linguistic diversity
        growth models
        language impairment
        Spanish
        vocabulary
        bilingual
        children
        cultural and linguistic diversity
        growth models
        language impairment
        Spanish
        vocabulary
      ab: Purpose: In this study, the authors evaluated the efficacy of a Spanish-English versus English-only vocabulary intervention for dual-language learners (DLLs) with language impairment compared to mathematics intervention groups and typically developing controls with no intervention. Further, in this study the authors also examined whether the language of instruction affected English, Spanish, and conceptual vocabulary differentially. Method: The authors randomly assigned 202 preschool DLLs with language impairment to 1 of 4 conditions: bilingual vocabulary, English-only vocabulary, bilingual mathematics, or English-only mathematics. Fifty-four DLLs with typical development received no intervention. The vocabulary intervention consisted of a 12-week small- group dialogic reading and hands-on vocabulary instruction of 45 words. Postintervention group differences and linear growth rates were examined in conceptual, English, and Spanish receptive and expressive vocabulary for the 45 treatment words. Results: Results indicate that the bilingual vocabulary intervention facilitated receptive and expressive Spanish and conceptual vocabulary gains in DLLs with language impairment compared with the English vocabulary intervention, mathematics intervention, and no-intervention groups. The English-only vocabulary intervention differed significantly from the mathematics condition and no- intervention groups on all measures but did not differ from the bilingual vocabulary intervention. Vocabulary growth rates postintervention slowed considerably. Results support the idea that bilingual interventions support native- and second- language vocabulary development. Conclusion: English-only intervention supports only English. Use of repeated dialogic reading and hands-on activities facilitates vocabulary acquisition.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N