Dissenting with queer theory: reading Rancière queerly.

In this article, the author looks to the work of Jacques Rancière to engage the possibilities in dissensus in queer theory in education. Fatigued of Foucault, bored with Butler, disdainful of Derrida and dumbfounded by Deleuze and Guattari, and just generally tired of feeling bullied into citing par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. 419 - 433
Autor principal: Greteman, Adam J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=95976800&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 95976800
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01596306
        54J
      jtl: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
      issn: 01596306
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2014
      vid: 35
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        95976800
        10.1080/01596306.2014.888845
      ppf: 419
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 136KB
      tig:
        atl: Dissenting with queer theory: reading Rancière queerly.
      aug:
        au: Greteman, Adam J.
        affil: Department of Art Education, School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
      su:
        Queer theory
        Pastures
        Education
        Agriculture
        Grazing
      sug:
        subj:
          Queer theory
          Pastures
          Education
          Agriculture
          Grazing
      keyword:
        dissensus
        education
        humor
        queer
        Rancière
        Rancière
      ab: In this article, the author looks to the work of Jacques Rancière to engage the possibilities in dissensus in queer theory in education. Fatigued of Foucault, bored with Butler, disdainful of Derrida and dumbfounded by Deleuze and Guattari, and just generally tired of feeling bullied into citing particular people and not others, the author attempts to join the growing use of Rancière in queer theory. Questions of queer theory's (or is it theories) relevance, its purpose, its contributions are asked more and more. While some have dissentedfromqueer theory for perhaps queerer pastures, the author dissentswithqueer theory showing how humor provides a concrete “application” to dissent from education's continued reactionary and conservative approaches. Queer theory may have been institutionalized, but it remains, as the author argues, a necessary and important political framework to intervene in the ongoing process of normalization.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N