Critical rationalism and engineering: ontology.

Engineering is often said to be 'scientific', but the nature of knowledge in engineering is different to science. Engineering has a different ontological basis-its theories address different entities and are judged by different criteria. In this paper I use Popper's three worlds ontological framewor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 191; no. 10; pp. 2255 - 2280
Autor principal: Staples, Mark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Engineering is often said to be 'scientific', but the nature of knowledge in engineering is different to science. Engineering has a different ontological basis-its theories address different entities and are judged by different criteria. In this paper I use Popper's three worlds ontological framework to propose a model of engineering theories, and provide an abstract logical view of engineering theories analogous to the deductive-nomological view of scientific theories. These models frame three key elements from definitions of engineering: requirements, designs of artefacts, and theories for reasoning about how artefacts will meet requirements. In a subsequent paper I use this ontological basis to explore methodological issues in the growth of engineering knowledge from the perspective of critical rationalism.