Critical rationalism and engineering: ontology.

Engineering is often said to be 'scientific', but the nature of knowledge in engineering is different to science. Engineering has a different ontological basis-its theories address different entities and are judged by different criteria. In this paper I use Popper's three worlds ontological framewor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 191; no. 10; pp. 2255 - 2280
Autor principal: Staples, Mark
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=96310793&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 96310793
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2014
      vid: 191
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        96310793
        10.1007/s11229-014-0396-3
      ppf: 2255
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 271KB
      tig:
        atl: Critical rationalism and engineering: ontology.
      aug:
        au: Staples, Mark
      su:
        Rationalism
        Ontology
        Engineering
        Critical thinking
        Facts (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Rationalism
          Ontology
          Engineering
          Critical thinking
          Facts (Philosophy)
      keyword: Critical rationalism
      ab: Engineering is often said to be 'scientific', but the nature of knowledge in engineering is different to science. Engineering has a different ontological basis-its theories address different entities and are judged by different criteria. In this paper I use Popper's three worlds ontological framework to propose a model of engineering theories, and provide an abstract logical view of engineering theories analogous to the deductive-nomological view of scientific theories. These models frame three key elements from definitions of engineering: requirements, designs of artefacts, and theories for reasoning about how artefacts will meet requirements. In a subsequent paper I use this ontological basis to explore methodological issues in the growth of engineering knowledge from the perspective of critical rationalism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2014. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N