And Justice for Nones.

The author presents his thoughts on why U.S. President Barack Obama should appoint a Supreme Court justice who claims no religious affiliation. He states that the current justices, all of whom have professed some form of religious affiliation, are unfair due to their lack of perspective. Particular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Humanist Vol. 74; no. 5; pp. 8 - 11
Autor principal: Murn, Charles
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Humanist Association Sep/Oct2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The author presents his thoughts on why U.S. President Barack Obama should appoint a Supreme Court justice who claims no religious affiliation. He states that the current justices, all of whom have professed some form of religious affiliation, are unfair due to their lack of perspective. Particular attention is given to the case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby which gave a private corporation the right to deny healthcare coverage for contraception it objects to on religious grounds.