And Justice for Nones.

The author presents his thoughts on why U.S. President Barack Obama should appoint a Supreme Court justice who claims no religious affiliation. He states that the current justices, all of whom have professed some form of religious affiliation, are unfair due to their lack of perspective. Particular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Humanist Vol. 74; no. 5; pp. 8 - 11
Autor principal: Murn, Charles
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Humanist Association Sep/Oct2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=97768830&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 97768830
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00187399
        HUM
      jtl: Humanist
      issn: 00187399
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep/Oct2014
      vid: 74
      iid: 5
      pid: 26
      pub: American Humanist Association
    artinfo:
      ui: 97768830
      ppf: 8
      ppct: 3
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.2MB
      tig:
        atl: And Justice for Nones.
      aug:
        au: Murn, Charles
      su:
        Selection & appointment of U.S. Supreme Court justices
        Attitudes toward religion
        Fairness
        Obama, Barack, 1961-
        Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.
      sug:
        subj:
          Selection & appointment of U.S. Supreme Court justices
          Attitudes toward religion
          Fairness
          Obama, Barack, 1961-
          Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc.
      ab: The author presents his thoughts on why U.S. President Barack Obama should appoint a Supreme Court justice who claims no religious affiliation. He states that the current justices, all of whom have professed some form of religious affiliation, are unfair due to their lack of perspective. Particular attention is given to the case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby which gave a private corporation the right to deny healthcare coverage for contraception it objects to on religious grounds.
      pubtype: Periodical
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Humanist is the property of American Humanist Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Humanist
      holder: American Humanist Association
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2014
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N