Electronic Information Systems and Human Services Organisations: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Participatory Design.
Recent research and evaluation of the forms of electronic information systems (IS) being used in child welfare agencies in both Australia and England and Wales have shown that, despite the many millions of dollars spent, not only are they unfit for purpose, but also they may undermine front line pra...
| Published in: | British Journal of Social Work Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 651 - 667 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | research Journal Article |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Mar2015
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=102382967&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 102382967 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00453102 BHO jtl: British Journal of Social Work issn: 00453102 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2015 vid: 45 iid: 2 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 102382967 103795833 103795833 10.1093/bjsw/bct126 102382967 ppf: 651 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Electronic Information Systems and Human Services Organisations: Avoiding the Pitfalls of Participatory Design. aug: au: Gillingham, Philip affil: Senior Lecturer in Social Work, School of Social Work and Human Services, University of Queensland (St Lucia Campus), Brisbane, Australia sug: subj: Health Information Systems Social Work Ethnographic Research Human Systems Design Systems Implementation Queensland Participant Observation Interviews Seminars and Workshops Focus Groups Child Welfare Case Studies Funding Source ab: Recent research and evaluation of the forms of electronic information systems (IS) being used in child welfare agencies in both Australia and England and Wales have shown that, despite the many millions of dollars spent, not only are they unfit for purpose, but also they may undermine front line practice. Jurisdictions may differ in their readiness to accept and respond to these criticisms, but attention is now turning to how IS can be designed that do meet the needs of practitioners. A particular problem that has been identified is the limited involvement that practitioners have had in the design of I Sand efforts are now being made to include them. Though there is a considerable amount of literature about how to include the intended users of technology in designing IS, there is a paucity of advice that is relevant to the particular circumstances of social work and social care practitioners. Drawing from an ethnographic study of an IS implementation project in a human services organisation, this article aims to begin to address this gap in the literature by articulating some of the pitfalls for social workers and other human services staff who may become involved in the design, or redesign, of IS. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|