Video-based cases disrupt deep critical thinking in problem-based learning.

Medical Education 2012: 46: 426-435 Context Video is a popular tool in problem-based learning (PBL), although its production requires resources and time. Few studies have examined the impact of the use of video in PBL upon cognitive processes and critical thinking. Those that have done focused on ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 46; no. 4; pp. 426 - 436
Autores principales: Basu Roy, Robindra, McMahon, Graham T
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2012
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=104537299&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 104537299
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2012
      vid: 46
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        104537299
        73464642
        10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04197.x
        NLM22429179
        104537299
      ppf: 426
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Video-based cases disrupt deep critical thinking in problem-based learning.
      aug:
        au:
          Basu Roy, Robindra
          McMahon, Graham T
        affil: Department of Paediatric Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Campus, London, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Education, Medical
          Learning Methods
          Problem-Based Learning
          Critical Thinking
          Audiovisuals
          Written Language
          Students, Medical
          Human
          Crossover Design
          Odds Ratio
          Thinking
          Confidence Intervals
          Student Attitudes
          Faculty Attitudes
          Random Assignment
          Case Studies
          Simulations
          Endocrinology
          Audiorecording
          Data Analysis Software
          Interrater Reliability
          Outcome Assessment
          Questionnaires
          Self Assessment
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Regression
          Female
          Male
          kappa Statistic
          Female
          Male
      ab: Medical Education 2012: 46: 426-435 Context Video is a popular tool in problem-based learning (PBL), although its production requires resources and time. Few studies have examined the impact of the use of video in PBL upon cognitive processes and critical thinking. Those that have done focused on cases involving physical signs, where video has natural advantages. Objectives This study aimed to investigate preferences for video- or text-based cases and the effects of each format upon medical students' deep thinking in PBL. Tutorials were based on material portraying interviews with patients with conditions that include psychosocial elements but no physical signs. Methods Four tutorial groups of students in a Year 2 endocrine and reproductive pathophysiology course participated in a crossover study using one video-based and one text-based case. Transcripts of tutorials were coded for depth of thinking by a blinded coder. A generalised estimating equation model was used to adjust for potential differences among groups, cases, and tutor participation. The distribution of cognitive activity within the crossover groups and the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for deep versus superficial thinking were calculated. A prior cohort of 165 students and 18 tutors completed a survey of learning preferences. Results Of 5224 student utterances, the majority referred to problem exploration (2622, 50%) and description (1479, 28%). Overall, the odds of deep thinking versus superficial thinking were significantly lower using video-based cases compared with text-based cases (2045 deep/2454 for video versus 1961 deep/2218 for text; OR 0.663, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.582-0.754; p < 0.0001). This was also true for the problem exploration domain (1217 deep/1365 for video versus 1178 deep/1257 for text; OR 0.559, 95% CI 0.355-0.882; p = 0.0125). The majority of students (59%) and tutors (78%) indicated a preference for video-based cases over text-based cases. Conclusions Students and their tutors prefer video-based cases in PBL. However, compared with text-based material, the use of video-based material that refers to cases without dynamic physical signs is associated with a reduction in deep thinking.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N