Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.

No method of standard setting for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) is perfect. Using scores aggregated across stations risks allowing students who are incompetent in some core skills to pass an examination, which may not be acceptable for high stakes assessments. To assess the feas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 38; no. 8; pp. 825 - 832
Autores principales: Chesser AM, Laing MR, Miedzybrodzka ZH, Brittenden J, Heys SD
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106082399&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106082399
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2004
      vid: 38
      iid: 8
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106082399
        2009397764
        10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01821.x
        NLM15271042
        106082399
      ppf: 825
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Factor analysis can be a useful standard setting tool in a high stakes OSCE assessment.
      aug:
        au:
          Chesser AM
          Laing MR
          Miedzybrodzka ZH
          Brittenden J
          Heys SD
      sug:
        subj:
          Education, Medical Standards
          Educational Measurement Standards
          Clinical Competence Standards
          Factor Analysis
          Reproducibility of Results
          Human
      ab: No method of standard setting for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) is perfect. Using scores aggregated across stations risks allowing students who are incompetent in some core skills to pass an examination, which may not be acceptable for high stakes assessments. To assess the feasibility of using a factor analysis of station scores in a high stakes OSCE to derive measures of underlying competencies. A 12-station OSCE was administered to all 192 students in the penultimate undergraduate year at the University of Aberdeen Medical School. Analysis of the correlation table of station scores was used to exclude stations performing unreliably. Factor analysis of the remaining station scores was carried out to characterise the underlying competencies being assessed. Factor scores were used to derive pass/fail cut-off scores for the examination. Four stations were identified as having unpredicted variations in station scores. Analysis of the content of these stations allowed the underlying problems with the station designs to be isolated. Factor analysis of the remaining 8 stations revealed 3 main underlying factors, accounting for 53% of the total variance in scores. These were labelled 'examination skills', 'communication skills' and 'history taking skills'. Factor analysis is a useful tool for characterising and quantifying the skills that are assessed in an OSCE. Standard setting procedures can be used to calculate cut-off scores for each underlying factor.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N