The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge.

Types of learning with a strong emphasis on the responsibility of the learner (such as discovery learning) are gaining popularity over traditional forms of (expository) instruction. Discovery learning distinguishes itself by the central role of learning processes such as hypothesis generation (induc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 225 - 235
Autores principales: Swaak J, de Jong T, van Joolingen WR
Formato: clinical trial pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106682512&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106682512
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2004
      vid: 20
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106682512
        106682512
        2004152849
        10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00092.x
        106682512
      ppf: 225
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge.
      aug:
        au:
          Swaak J
          de Jong T
          van Joolingen WR
        affil: Telematica Instituut, PO Box 589, 7500 AN Enschede, The Netherlands; janine.swaak@telin.nl
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Knowledge Evaluation
          Learning Methods
          Adolescence
          Analysis of Variance
          Clinical Trials
          Comparative Studies
          Pretest-Posttest Design
          Random Assignment
          Simulations
          Students, High School
          Human
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
      ab: Types of learning with a strong emphasis on the responsibility of the learner (such as discovery learning) are gaining popularity over traditional forms of (expository) instruction. Discovery learning distinguishes itself by the central role of learning processes such as hypothesis generation (induction), experiment design, and data interpretation. Expository instruction pays more attention to directly 'exposing' definitions and equations to learners. In the current study, students worked with either a simulation (discovery learning) or a hypertext learning environment (expository instruction) with the same domain content. Each of the environments contained a large number of assignments. The study followed a pre-test, post-test design. To measure the knowledge acquired a definitional knowledge test, an intuitive knowledge test (where both correctness and speed of answering are aspects that are measured) and a test in which relations needed to be explained were administered. It was predicted that the hypertext group would outperform the simulation group on the definitional knowledge test and it was expected that the simulation group would perform better on the intuitive knowledge test. Results showed that both the interaction with the simulation and with the hypertext resulted in substantial learning gains. It was found that the hypertext group performed better on the definitional knowledge test. On the intuitive knowledge test the hypertext scored better than the simulation group on the correctness of the items but not on the time needed to answer items. On the explanation test there was no difference between the two groups. An analysis of interaction processes as recorded in the logfiles indicates that the differences between both environments in their actual usage were less distinctive than expected. In the simulation group many students followed the assignments given and did not engage in self-guided discovery. Since the assignments were rather directive, this resulted in 'discovery behaviour' that focused on generating outcomes; outcomes that were also, and more directly presented in the hypertext environment. For research and practice, this implies that simulations are to be considered only when clear benefits of discovery are expected, and only with complex domains, sufficient learning time and freedom for students in the assignments to engage in discovery.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N