Cost-benefit analysis indicates the positive economic benefits of the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program related to chronic disease prevention.

Objective: To provide an estimated cost-benefit ratio for the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP), based on potential prevention of diet-related chronic diseases and conditions. Design: A retrospective cost-benefit study using demographic, food/nutrient intake, and food-related beh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. 26 - 38
Autores principales: Rajgopal R, Cox RH, Lambur M, Lewis EC
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Jan/Feb2002
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To provide an estimated cost-benefit ratio for the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP), based on potential prevention of diet-related chronic diseases and conditions. Design: A retrospective cost-benefit study using demographic, food/nutrient intake, and food-related behavioral data previously collected on program participants by trained paraprofessionals, before and after an intervention. Actual costs of implementing EFNEP for 1 year (1996) were also used. Subjects/Settings: 3100 female and male adults who had participated in the Virginia EFNEP during 1996. Intervention: Prior participation in 6 to 12 food/nutrition education lessons with subsequent graduation from EFNEP. Main Outcome Measures: Cost-benefit ratios for EFNEP, based on original assumptions and subsequent sensitivity analyses. Statistical Analysis: Program implementation costs were compiled and compared with monetized benefits of disease prevention to produce benefit-to-cost ratios. Excel and SPSS computer programs were used to compute cost-benefit ratios based on standard procedures used in the field of economics. Results: The initial benefit-to-cost ratio was $10.64⁄$1.00, with subsequent sensitivity analyses producing ratios ranging from $2.66⁄1.00 to $17.04⁄1.00. Implications: The results of EFNEP intervention translate into a positive cost-benefit based on potential prevention of diet-related chronic diseases and conditions. Thus, EFNEP is a good use of federal tax dollars.