Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: role of feedback-characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions.
Feedback literature identifies mindful cognitive processing of (peer) feedback and (peer) feedback characteristics - as well as the presence of justifications for feedback - as important for its efficiency. However, mindful cognitive processing has yet to be operationalized and investigated. In this...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 31; no. 5; pp. 422 - 435 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2015
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109474152&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 109474152 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02664909 6M1 jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning issn: 02664909 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2015 vid: 31 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 109474152 109474152 109474152 10.1111/jcal.12091 109474152 ppf: 422 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Inferring mindful cognitive-processing of peer-feedback via eye-tracking: role of feedback-characteristics, fixation-durations and transitions. aug: au: Bolzer, M. Strijbos, J.W. Fischer, F. affil: Department of Psychology, Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität Munich, Munich Germany sug: subj: Mindfulness Eye Movements Evaluation Cognition Peer Group Human Students, College Male Female Adult Middle Age Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Task Performance and Analysis Analysis of Variance Reading Feedback Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Feedback literature identifies mindful cognitive processing of (peer) feedback and (peer) feedback characteristics - as well as the presence of justifications for feedback - as important for its efficiency. However, mindful cognitive processing has yet to be operationalized and investigated. In this study, an operationalization of mindful cognitive processing is introduced, alongside an investigation to identify valid measures for it. In a between-subjects design, peer feedback ( PF) content [elaborated specific feedback with justifications ( ESF + J) vs. elaborated specific feedback without justifications ( ESF)] was varied. Students received a scenario containing an essay by a fictional student and fictional PF, followed by a text revision, distraction and PF recall task. Eye tracking was applied to measure (a) how written PF was (re-) read (fixation durations) and (b) the number of transitions occurring between PF and essay text. Mindful cognitive processing was inferred from the relation between fixation durations on PF and number of transitions between essay text and PF with (a) text revision performance and (b) PF recall performance. When no justifications were provided, recipients invested more time in reading the PF and essay and increased the effort to relate the PF to essay text. Fixation durations and number of transitions proved to be valid measures to infer mindful cognitive processing. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|