Integrated Knowledge Translation and Grant Development: Addressing the Research Practice Gap through Stakeholder-informed Research.
OBJECTIVE: We describe our stakeholder engagement process for grant application development that occurred as part of our integrated knowledge translation plan and make recommendations for researchers. METHOD: In phase 1, a stakeholder consultation group was developed. In phase 2, surveys regarding k...
| Publicado en: | Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 268 - 275 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Nov2013
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=109660953&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 109660953 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17198429 785M jtl: Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry issn: 17198429 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2013 vid: 22 iid: 4 pid: 42044 pub: Canadian Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry place: Ottawa, Ontario artinfo: ui: 109660953 2012371554 NLM24223045 109660953 ppf: 268 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: Integrated Knowledge Translation and Grant Development: Addressing the Research Practice Gap through Stakeholder-informed Research. aug: au: Henderson, Joanna Brownlie, Elizabeth Rosenkranz, Susan Chaim, Gloria Beitchman, Joseph affil: Child, Youth and Family Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. sug: ab: OBJECTIVE: We describe our stakeholder engagement process for grant application development that occurred as part of our integrated knowledge translation plan and make recommendations for researchers. METHOD: In phase 1, a stakeholder consultation group was developed. In phase 2, surveys regarding knowledge gathering, research agenda, and research collaboration preferences were sent to 333 cross-sectoral youth-serving organizations in Ontario, including family and consumer organizations. RESULTS: In phase 1, 28 stakeholders from six sectors participated in the consultation group and provided input on multiple aspects of the proposal. Through this process, 19 stakeholders adopted formal roles within the project. In phase 2, 206 surveys were received (response rate = 62%). Survey responses supported the grant focus (concurrent youth mental health and substance use problems). Respondents also prioritized project goals and provided specific feedback on research and knowledge translation. Finally, although some stakeholders chose greater involvement, most survey respondents indicated a preference for a moderate level of participation in research rather than full team membership. CONCLUSIONS: Despite short timelines and feasibility challenges, stakeholders can be meaningfully engaged in and contribute to the grant proposal development process. Consideration is needed for the practical challenges that stakeholder organizations face in supporting and participating in research. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|